Tags |
|
|
Links |
|
|
Added for You - Leaning the Collar Strategy
Working from Home: Scam or Dream Come True
“Home-based business.” The name itself either leaves you with a squeamish feeling that has its roots in words like shyster, huckster and con or it has you thinking you may have found the answer to financial difficulties you may be facing.Many home-based job opportunities are simple investment opportunities. The primary difference is a job isn’t really a job unless you are paid. Most home-based ‘jobs’
r>
example using the Dec. 30 call.“Home-based business.” The name itself either leaves you with a squeamish feeling that has its roots in words like shyster, huckster and con or it has you thinking you may have found the answer to financial difficulties you may be facing.Many home-based job opportunities are simple investment opportunities. The primary difference is a job isn’t really a job unless you are paid. Most home-based ‘jobs’
As in all trading situations that offer a higher potential
reward, there comes a higher potential risk. If the stock stays
at $28.50, (the stagnant scenario) you have a loss of $.65 in
option costs. In the down “scenario,” calculating the maximum
risk is done by setting the stock price at $27.50 on expiration.
The stock, purchased at $28.50 has lost $1.00. The options, not
neutral, resulted in a $.65 loss. The total loss is $1.65. In
both the “stagnant” and “down” scenarios, the loss increased
over that in our original example. As you can se
Job Layoff: Defusing The Anger
Along with the fear and internal humiliation of losing your job, there is always a degree of anger: anger at fate for dealing you a lousy hand; anger at a company that took your long hours and hard work and threw them away without a second thought; anger at coworkers who played the political game more deftly and kept their positions when yours was eliminated.Some of us are so angry that we get stuck
Like other strategies, the collar can be leaned toward theAlong with the fear and internal humiliation of losing your job, there is always a degree of anger: anger at fate for dealing you a lousy hand; anger at a company that took your long hours and hard work and threw them away without a second thought; anger at coworkers who played the political game more deftly and kept their positions when yours was eliminated.Some of us are so angry that we get stuck
investor's perception of the stock's direction and strength.
Let’s look at the potential leans that can be taken. Say that
you have a very strong feeling the XYZ is going to go up.
Instead of buying a put and selling a call with strikes that are
roughly equidistant from the stock price, you would sell a call
that is further out-of-the-money.
This would allow more room for a larger increase in stock price
because the stock would not be called away as early. You retain
ownership for a longer period of time during the increasing
price period.
Of course, by increasing the distance of the option’s strike
away from the stock, the amount of the call's premium will
decrease. The overall effect is that you’ll have to pay more to
own the position. (You will pay out more money for the put than
you will receive from the call.)
Again, we'll start with the same prices as in our original case,
(stock $28.00, Dec. 27.5 put $1.00 and Dec. 30 call $1.00) only
now we will change the Dec. 30 call at $1.00 to the Dec. 32.5
call at $ .35.
In our other examples, we incurred no debit or credit from our
option position. This time, with the bullish lean, a debit is
incurred. The purchase of the Dec. 27.5 put for $1.00 combined
with the receipt of $ .35 from the sale of the Dec. 32.5 call
produces a $ .65 debit.
Remember, this debit must be subtracted from the bottom line
profit or added to the bottom line loss of the stock's capital
result. This means that before you make any money from the
position, the stock must trade up $ .65.
If the stock stays stagnant you will lose $ .65, and any capital
loss you incur will be $ .65 worse. Now back to the position in
our previous example. With the selling of the Dec. 30 call, we
had an upside potential of $1.50. In this example things change.
As was stated, our maximum upside potential is calculated by
setting the stock price at the strike price of the short call
which is 32.5 in this case. With the stock at $32.50 at
expiration, you would have a $4.00 stock gain since the stock
was purchased for $28.50.
Remembering your $ .65 debit to enter the position, we subtract
that from the $4.00 and we have a total maximum profit of $3.35.
This is significantly more potential reward than our original
example using the Dec. 30 call.
As in all trading situations that offer a higher potential
reward, there comes a higher potential risk. If the stock stays
at $28.50, (the stagnant scenario) you have a loss of $.65 in
option costs. In the down “scenario,” calculating the maximum
risk is done by setting the stock price at $27.50 on expiration.
The stock, purchased at $28.50 has lost $1.00. The options, not
neutral, resulted in a $.65 loss. The total loss is $1.65. In
both the “stagnant” and “down” scenarios, the loss increased
over that in our original example. As you can se
How to Start An Article Directory Geared for Success
Maybe you've heard that an article directory can make a killing in affiliate or Google Adsense income, but there are some more things you need to know when you start yours.Here are the first basic steps involved in starting your own article directory:1) Get an article directory script. 2) Buy a good domain name that gives some indication of what your site is about. 3) Buy web h
reasingMaybe you've heard that an article directory can make a killing in affiliate or Google Adsense income, but there are some more things you need to know when you start yours.Here are the first basic steps involved in starting your own article directory:1) Get an article directory script. 2) Buy a good domain name that gives some indication of what your site is about. 3) Buy web h
price period.
Of course, by increasing the distance of the option’s strike
away from the stock, the amount of the call's premium will
decrease. The overall effect is that you’ll have to pay more to
own the position. (You will pay out more money for the put than
you will receive from the call.)
Again, we'll start with the same prices as in our original case,
(stock $28.00, Dec. 27.5 put $1.00 and Dec. 30 call $1.00) only
now we will change the Dec. 30 call at $1.00 to the Dec. 32.5
call at $ .35.
In our other examples, we incurred no debit or credit from our
option position. This time, with the bullish lean, a debit is
incurred. The purchase of the Dec. 27.5 put for $1.00 combined
with the receipt of $ .35 from the sale of the Dec. 32.5 call
produces a $ .65 debit.
Remember, this debit must be subtracted from the bottom line
profit or added to the bottom line loss of the stock's capital
result. This means that before you make any money from the
position, the stock must trade up $ .65.
If the stock stays stagnant you will lose $ .65, and any capital
loss you incur will be $ .65 worse. Now back to the position in
our previous example. With the selling of the Dec. 30 call, we
had an upside potential of $1.50. In this example things change.
As was stated, our maximum upside potential is calculated by
setting the stock price at the strike price of the short call
which is 32.5 in this case. With the stock at $32.50 at
expiration, you would have a $4.00 stock gain since the stock
was purchased for $28.50.
Remembering your $ .65 debit to enter the position, we subtract
that from the $4.00 and we have a total maximum profit of $3.35.
This is significantly more potential reward than our original
example using the Dec. 30 call.
As in all trading situations that offer a higher potential
reward, there comes a higher potential risk. If the stock stays
at $28.50, (the stagnant scenario) you have a loss of $.65 in
option costs. In the down “scenario,” calculating the maximum
risk is done by setting the stock price at $27.50 on expiration.
The stock, purchased at $28.50 has lost $1.00. The options, not
neutral, resulted in a $.65 loss. The total loss is $1.65. In
both the “stagnant” and “down” scenarios, the loss increased
over that in our original example. As you can se
Develop Loyal Customers for a Lifetime - part 1 (1 - 10)
Traditional marketing strategies encourage business owners to continually grow their businesses by adding new customers. In today's competitive world of business, it is more important than ever to aim for more transactions with existing customers by using the power of customer follow-up and attention to good service.These first ten tips will help you in turning your existing customers into walking b
ourTraditional marketing strategies encourage business owners to continually grow their businesses by adding new customers. In today's competitive world of business, it is more important than ever to aim for more transactions with existing customers by using the power of customer follow-up and attention to good service.These first ten tips will help you in turning your existing customers into walking b
option position. This time, with the bullish lean, a debit is
incurred. The purchase of the Dec. 27.5 put for $1.00 combined
with the receipt of $ .35 from the sale of the Dec. 32.5 call
produces a $ .65 debit.
Remember, this debit must be subtracted from the bottom line
profit or added to the bottom line loss of the stock's capital
result. This means that before you make any money from the
position, the stock must trade up $ .65.
If the stock stays stagnant you will lose $ .65, and any capital
loss you incur will be $ .65 worse. Now back to the position in
our previous example. With the selling of the Dec. 30 call, we
had an upside potential of $1.50. In this example things change.
As was stated, our maximum upside potential is calculated by
setting the stock price at the strike price of the short call
which is 32.5 in this case. With the stock at $32.50 at
expiration, you would have a $4.00 stock gain since the stock
was purchased for $28.50.
Remembering your $ .65 debit to enter the position, we subtract
that from the $4.00 and we have a total maximum profit of $3.35.
This is significantly more potential reward than our original
example using the Dec. 30 call.
As in all trading situations that offer a higher potential
reward, there comes a higher potential risk. If the stock stays
at $28.50, (the stagnant scenario) you have a loss of $.65 in
option costs. In the down “scenario,” calculating the maximum
risk is done by setting the stock price at $27.50 on expiration.
The stock, purchased at $28.50 has lost $1.00. The options, not
neutral, resulted in a $.65 loss. The total loss is $1.65. In
both the “stagnant” and “down” scenarios, the loss increased
over that in our original example. As you can se
But We've Always Done It This Way
Sacred cows take a long time to die. We get comfortable in the way we do things and lose sight of how they could be improved. Here's an interesting story.A woman was in the process of fixing her special holiday ham. She cleaned it and then took a huge knife, lopped off both ends of the ham and placed it in a pan. Her daughter, who was learning how to cook asked, "Now Mom, why did you do that?"
previous example. With the selling of the Dec. 30 call, weSacred cows take a long time to die. We get comfortable in the way we do things and lose sight of how they could be improved. Here's an interesting story.A woman was in the process of fixing her special holiday ham. She cleaned it and then took a huge knife, lopped off both ends of the ham and placed it in a pan. Her daughter, who was learning how to cook asked, "Now Mom, why did you do that?"
had an upside potential of $1.50. In this example things change.
As was stated, our maximum upside potential is calculated by
setting the stock price at the strike price of the short call
which is 32.5 in this case. With the stock at $32.50 at
expiration, you would have a $4.00 stock gain since the stock
was purchased for $28.50.
Remembering your $ .65 debit to enter the position, we subtract
that from the $4.00 and we have a total maximum profit of $3.35.
This is significantly more potential reward than our original
example using the Dec. 30 call.
As in all trading situations that offer a higher potential
reward, there comes a higher potential risk. If the stock stays
at $28.50, (the stagnant scenario) you have a loss of $.65 in
option costs. In the down “scenario,” calculating the maximum
risk is done by setting the stock price at $27.50 on expiration.
The stock, purchased at $28.50 has lost $1.00. The options, not
neutral, resulted in a $.65 loss. The total loss is $1.65. In
both the “stagnant” and “down” scenarios, the loss increased
over that in our original example. As you can se
Still Selling By The Numbers?
For years, sales managers and sales trainers have been saying that sales is a ‘numbers’ game. I can recall my first sales manager telling me over 35 years ago, “If you will see enough people, you will make enough sales.” First of all what’s enough sales? Second of all, how many is enough people? Thirdly, is this the best approach to take to prospect for new business? When I wrote Soft Sell in 1981, it w
r>
example using the Dec. 30 call.For years, sales managers and sales trainers have been saying that sales is a ‘numbers’ game. I can recall my first sales manager telling me over 35 years ago, “If you will see enough people, you will make enough sales.” First of all what’s enough sales? Second of all, how many is enough people? Thirdly, is this the best approach to take to prospect for new business? When I wrote Soft Sell in 1981, it w
As in all trading situations that offer a higher potential
reward, there comes a higher potential risk. If the stock stays
at $28.50, (the stagnant scenario) you have a loss of $.65 in
option costs. In the down “scenario,” calculating the maximum
risk is done by setting the stock price at $27.50 on expiration.
The stock, purchased at $28.50 has lost $1.00. The options, not
neutral, resulted in a $.65 loss. The total loss is $1.65. In
both the “stagnant” and “down” scenarios, the loss increased
over that in our original example. As you can see, the higher
potential gain is accompanied by an increased potential risk.
HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
<a href="http://www.added4u.com/article/103510/added4u-Leaning-the-Collar-Strategy.html">Leaning the Collar Strategy</a>
BB link (for phorums):
[url=http://www.added4u.com/article/103510/added4u-Leaning-the-Collar-Strategy.html]Leaning the Collar Strategy[/url]
Related Articles:
Customers…The Other White Meat
Outsourcing Boom Equals School Business Boom
What Chance the New Online Marketer in the World of Internet Marketing? Part III
Bookmark it:
|