Added for You
#1 in Business Subscribe Email Print

You are here: Home > Finance > Currency Trading > Forex Secrets - The True And False Breakouts Of The Resistance And Support Levels on Forex (Part II)

Tags

  • point
  • subtracted
  • concepts
  • situation nevertheless
  • order opening
  • thinking about

  • Links

  • Career Tip: Your Lifestyle Affects Your Job Choice!
  • Are World Leaders Crazy for Leading Us to War?
  • The Value of An Ohio Bankruptcy Attorney
  • Added for You - Forex Secrets - The True And False Breakouts Of The Resistance And Support Levels on Forex (Part II)

    Technical Optimization for Affiliates
    Technical optimization refers to all the factors related to the technical details of your website, and how they affect the ranking of your site in search engines. They are important because they give valuable information to the spider that crawls your site, and ultimately decides how close to the top of a search you are placed. And this visibility directly impacts the traffic and profitability of your website.Optimizing includes:Keywords in your URL (optimal, but not always possible)Keyword density of about 8% per pageKey phrases that relate to the keywords of very pageKeywords in titles and headingsBold and capitalized wordsKeywords in the first and last sentences of each pageKeywords and secondary keyword optimization on the site’s home pageLogical linking of pages within the siteBacklinks and reciprocal links with complementary high quality sitesProvision of sitemaps to Google, and updating them after site modificationsMaking the most of technical optimization is important, but it is only the first step in creating a solid, useful site that earns repeat visits from its target market. Other factors involved include:Focusing the scope of the site to address the needs of a particular nicheCreating a sense of communityProviding useful informationIntroducing new concepts or trendsOffering adviceGiving access to expertsSolving problemsProviding a forum for the exchange of ideasProviding links to focused research and other resources
    ement (by 440 points!). Now one could expect a local minimum at 1.7310 - to be more precise, at 1.7435. Exactly at this point, after the breakout thorough the previous day maximum, the currency has reversed.

    Chart 2. 12 GBP/USD pair movement (For view the picture see notes in end of article)

    Thus, making use of the technique by Swagger one can gain just 125 points under the conditions of a strong trend (690 points). However, one must keep in mind that the reversal could happen earlier. That is, one losed 500 point in order to dogmatically stick to the rule “not to open a deal during the first 5 days after the level breakout”. As the result, a deal will be opened at the end of the currency movement or before the recoil. When a dogma does not correspond to the practice any more, it would be better to decline (reject) it, would not it?

    We now dwell on the recoil system according to T. Chand in his book “On the other side of the technical analysis). Notwithstanding all the positive aspects of this system, a very serious drawback is inherent in it. That is, within the framework of this system one cannot detect a point at which the recoil turns into the reversal.

    The theory of the level breakout, developed by D. Cats and D. McCormick in “Encyclopedia of trading strategies”, must be revised (specified) from the viewpoint of (with respect to) the price of closing in the previous day. That is, one can give hundreds of examples when the work according to the given technique is profitable at Forex. At the same time, there are also hundreds of disadvantageous situations – e.g., the breakout through a local peak in the previous day can result either in the reversal or in a very heavy recoil towards the direction, opposite to the level breakout.

    In the framework of the classical analysis given to Forex, the notions of technical levels of resistance/support of tilted (slant) and horizontal channels are not clearly defined – they are just “piled up”. Hence, how can one tell the difference between these characteristics from those the features in common?

    Elder was the first who attracted attention to the following problem. How to elaborate one’s position in all the mess of true and false breakouts, trends and flats in different time frames?

    The currency pair movement may be divided as following.

    a) trend waves;

    b) trend recoils;

    c) a flat.

    After this, all pos

    Affiliate Revenue - How Important is Article Marketing in Building Affiliate Revenue Sources?
    Affiliate revenue is one very strong form of revenue online. The nice, obvious thing about affiliate marketing is you don’t have to have a customer service effort, you don’t have to have your own sales page (although I do recommend a web site with a squeeze page!), and you don’t have to worry about getting paid (as long as you are dealing with reputable affiliate managers and programs).So what does article marketing have to do with building affiliate revenue? I make the assumption that you already realize that to most effectively build affiliate revenue, you need to build your own list, rather than sending your hard-earned traffic directly to affiliate web sites.Now, if you are building your own list, and especially if you are writing your own emails, article marketing fits in perfectly. You see, when someone reads your article and chooses to click through to your squeeze page, they already like your style (or they wouldn’t have clicked through). And when they subscribe to your list, and receive your emails, they are much more likely to respond to your recommendations, especially if you are writing your own emails.By the way, why is it important to write your own emails? When you write all your own copy, from the articles, to the squeeze page copy, to the emails, your subscribers develop a subconscious bond with your style. They liked you at the article, they liked you at the squeeze page, why would you use an affiliate-written email in your campaign? Write your own email, or if you simply cannot write, have the same person writing your emails as writes your articles.
    See beginning of this article under name "Forex Secrets - The True And False Breakouts Of The Resistance And Support Levels on Forex. (Part I)”

    In “Stock exchange secrets”, L. Connors and L. Rushky state the following. In trading on the deviations (oscillations), the most appropriate model is the trading on the trial of the previous peaks (maximums or minimums). Such tests enable us to indicate the double breakpoint (rest-point, salient point). Thus, one can find a perfect position for opening a deal. Under such conditions, the risk of losses is minimal. The detection (test, probe) of a minimum, where the long-term position must be opened, can take place slightly higher or lower. All the same, the support cannot be established before the realization of the detection (test, probe). The majority of our models has become formed exactly after the successful detection (test, probe) – i.e., after the previous maximum/minimum approbation by the market and returning to this value again.

    Chart 2.9. An example of the double breakpoint (rest-point, salient point). (For view the picture see notes in end of article)

    T. DeMarque has examined the difference between the true and false breakouts through the technical levels. He has emphasized the importance of estimating whether the intra-day price breakouts are true. TD-points must be chosen correctly. TD-line must be plotted from the right to the left. The price guideposts must be calculated. After this, the three way-outs must be considered:

    1. There can appear the signs of the tendency reversal.

    2. A substantial shift in the correlation between the demand and proposal is possible.

    3. The price guidepost realization is important as well.

    Besides, there is another factor, to which the attention should be paid. One must consider whether the intra-day price breakout is true. This is especially important. I regard my investigations in this area as a substantial contribution into improving of the technique of choice of a moment of entering the market - and leaving it. What is more, the given principles are applicable in other methods of the technical analysis as well. The following situation is rather typical. Traders take a position at points of the trend line breakout to-be. Than they with horror watch that prices stop and start to move in the opposite direction. This results in substantial losses. However, those very traders keep on doing the same mistake, not thinking about the origins of it. False breakouts are always rather frequent. It is trader’s stumbling block, because of which some of traders totally refuse to use the trend line. A techniques of developing TD-lines has somewhat improved this situation. Nevertheless, false breakouts do happen. As far as I know, a technique of estimating whether the breakout is false or true is not developed yet.

    We now dwell on the breakout qualifiers.

    TD-qualifier of the breakout #1.

    The signal of “buy” is true if the price of closing has decreased the day before the signal arrival.

    The signal of “sell” is true if the price of closing has increased the day before the signal arrival

    TD-qualifier of the breakout #2.

    The signal of “buy” is true if the price of opening is higher than the price of breakout.

    The signal of “sell” is true if the price of opening is lower than the price of breakout.

    TD-qualifier of the breakout #3.

    The signal of “buy” is true if the price of closing on the eve of the breakout, summed up with the difference between the price of closing and the minimum price in the same day (or the price of closing the two days before the breakout if it is lower) is lower than the price of breakout.

    The signal of “sell” is true if the difference between the price of closing on the eve of breakout and the difference between the maximal prices of closing in the same day (or the price of closing the two days before the breakout if it is higher) exceeds the price of breakout.

    I have discovered three TD Breakout Qualifiers. There are two price models, formed the day before the probable breakout. In addition, there is one model, which is formed in the day of breakout. In particular, I have drawn the following conclusion. If a market is in the state of oversell (overbuy) the day before the breakout, there increases the possibility that the amount (pressure) of buyers (sellers) all the same will not become diminished after the breakout. This makes just illusion of the market strength (weakness).

    Giving analysis to the price behavior on the eve of breakout, I have discovered the following. If the price of closing on the eve of breakout upwards is lower than in the previous day, the probability of the true intra-day breakout increases.

    In this case, it can be recommended to open a position in the intra-day intersection (crossing) of the trend line. I determine this as TD Breakout Qualifier #1 (see Chart 1.37 ??).

    In a way, TD Breakout Qualifier #3 is similar to TD Breakout Qualifier #1. Really, it also takes into account the price movement on the eve of the trend line breakout. However, in the case of TD Breakout Qualifier #3 one determines the difference between the maximum price and the price of closing on the eve of the trend line breakout downwards. Further this difference is subtracted from that very price of closing. It is the method of calculating the supply value. The demand value is calculated in the following way. The difference between the price of closing and the minimum price on the eve of the trend line breakout upwards is added tothat very price of closing (see Charts 2.10, 2.11 (143 and 144)).

    Chart 2.10 S T Bonds. (For view the picture see notes in end of article)

    The true breakout can be detected in the following way. One must find the difference between the price of closing on the eve the breakout upwards and the minimum price in that very day (or the price of closing in the previous day – if it is lower). Further it is necessary to add this difference to the price of closing in the day before the breakout. If the value obtained is lower than the price at the point of breakout, the breakout is considered true. If the value obtained is larger than the price at the point of breakout - most probably, the breakout is false

    In the given example (see Chart ??), the difference between the price of closing and the minimum price on the eve of the breakout of TD-line of supply (A-B) is added to the price of closing in that very day. The value obtained is smaller than the price at the point of breakout. Consequently, the trend line breakout is true. In this chart TD-line of demand (A’-B’) is also drawn (plotted).

    In Chart (145??), for determining whether the trend line breakout downwards is true, the use is made of the procedure, the sense of which is reversed with respect to the above-described one.

    Chart 2.11 S&P 500. (For view the picture see notes in end of article)

    First, one has to determine the difference between the price of closing and the price minimal on the eve of the supply line breakout upwards (A-B). Further, the price of closing in the same very day must be added to this difference. As one can see, the resulting value is smaller than the price at the breakout point. This confirms that the breakout is true.

    Chart 2.12 Soybeans Oil. (For view the picture see notes in end of article)

    The principal drawbacks of the “classical” theory of distinguishing the true and false breakouts of technical levels at Forex from the viewpoint of Masterforex-V TS.

    Such drawbacks are the following.

    1. The “classical” theory of the true and false breakouts of technical levels was developed not issuing from conditions of Forex money-market (where the trading volume was not taken into account). Some other markets were considered.

    2. Even T. DeMarque has recognized that this approach is incorrect in total. This classicist has admitted the following. As far as he is concerned, he still doesn’t know any technique that could permit traders to see whether the price breakout is true or false.

    One can judge by oneself.

    Really, it is evident that the deal opening directly after the previous day technical level breakout must be specified much more exactly. E. Neiman doesn’t write about this aspect directly. However, his approach to the order opening is based on the conviction that a given breakout must happen along the trend development direction. This approach must be scrutinized much more closely. The reason is that the one of the keystone figures of reversal (such as either “the head and shoulders”, or “the head and shoulders reversed”) is purely the result of (exactly indicates) a local peak breakout of the previous day.

    Some traders try “to play safe”. Avoiding not getting into the “head and shoulders” figure, they open deals after 5 (!) days to start from the technical level breakout. In this connection, there arise the following questions.

    Surely, one could give analysis to broad markets post factum. In this case, one can choose heavy trends of the duration within 30-70 days or longer (as Swagger did it). Thus, one can recommend traders to open their deals in the 6th day to start from the technical level breakout.

    However, what’s about the real trading? Under such conditions, a trader does not know the trend actual duration. For instance, see Chart 2.12 GBP/USD pair movement on June 30, 2006 can serve as an example. The support at 1.8000 has been broken through. After waiting for 5 days, one could open a deal in the vicinity to 1.7560 at the 6th day – i.e., after the currency has already advanced more than the half-way in its movement (by 440 points!). Now one could expect a local minimum at 1.7310 - to be more precise, at 1.7435. Exactly at this point, after the breakout thorough the previous day maximum, the currency has reversed.

    Chart 2. 12 GBP/USD pair movement (For view the picture see notes in end of article)

    Thus, making use of the technique by Swagger one can gain just 125 points under the conditions of a strong trend (690 points). However, one must keep in mind that the reversal could happen earlier. That is, one losed 500 point in order to dogmatically stick to the rule “not to open a deal during the first 5 days after the level breakout”. As the result, a deal will be opened at the end of the currency movement or before the recoil. When a dogma does not correspond to the practice any more, it would be better to decline (reject) it, would not it?

    We now dwell on the recoil system according to T. Chand in his book “On the other side of the technical analysis). Notwithstanding all the positive aspects of this system, a very serious drawback is inherent in it. That is, within the framework of this system one cannot detect a point at which the recoil turns into the reversal.

    The theory of the level breakout, developed by D. Cats and D. McCormick in “Encyclopedia of trading strategies”, must be revised (specified) from the viewpoint of (with respect to) the price of closing in the previous day. That is, one can give hundreds of examples when the work according to the given technique is profitable at Forex. At the same time, there are also hundreds of disadvantageous situations – e.g., the breakout through a local peak in the previous day can result either in the reversal or in a very heavy recoil towards the direction, opposite to the level breakout.

    In the framework of the classical analysis given to Forex, the notions of technical levels of resistance/support of tilted (slant) and horizontal channels are not clearly defined – they are just “piled up”. Hence, how can one tell the difference between these characteristics from those the features in common?

    Elder was the first who attracted attention to the following problem. How to elaborate one’s position in all the mess of true and false breakouts, trends and flats in different time frames?

    The currency pair movement may be divided as following.

    a) trend waves;

    b) trend recoils;

    c) a flat.

    After this, all poss

    What's An Autoresponder Software And How It Is Differant From An Autoresponder Service
    When talking about autoresponder email software we usually mean a piece of software package you can install on your server that will give you the autpresonder functionality . This software can be installed either on your computer itself, but in most cases nowadays, it's installed on your server (usually the one that hosts your site). This solution is better for people who want to have more control over their email lists, and to host them physically. Using this option, no 3rd party ever sees your lists, ann they are safe with you. The database that stores them is under your control and on your server, at all times. Let's take a look at some of the advantages you have when you use an autoresponder software: 1. You host your lists on your server and no-one can touch them. There were a few cases with autoresponder companies that went out of business, taking the email lists with them If you host your own lists, this will never happen. 2. You are using your own IP with emailing your list. If you outsource your auto responder, in most cases you will share an IP with other people. If one of them happens to be a spammer, your IP may be blocked from emailing certain ISP's. This will effect your email's deliverability. But - if you host your own lists, use your own server and your own unique IP - this scenario will never happen. 3. No monthly fees - You will pay a one time fee for purchasing the software package. You will not have to pay a monthly fee, so the long term costs are usually lower. All this doesn't mean using an autoresponer software doesn't have it's downsides. Let's take a look at the less glamorous: 1. If you're not technically inclined, you
    on doing the same mistake, not thinking about the origins of it. False breakouts are always rather frequent. It is trader’s stumbling block, because of which some of traders totally refuse to use the trend line. A techniques of developing TD-lines has somewhat improved this situation. Nevertheless, false breakouts do happen. As far as I know, a technique of estimating whether the breakout is false or true is not developed yet.

    We now dwell on the breakout qualifiers.

    TD-qualifier of the breakout #1.

    The signal of “buy” is true if the price of closing has decreased the day before the signal arrival.

    The signal of “sell” is true if the price of closing has increased the day before the signal arrival

    TD-qualifier of the breakout #2.

    The signal of “buy” is true if the price of opening is higher than the price of breakout.

    The signal of “sell” is true if the price of opening is lower than the price of breakout.

    TD-qualifier of the breakout #3.

    The signal of “buy” is true if the price of closing on the eve of the breakout, summed up with the difference between the price of closing and the minimum price in the same day (or the price of closing the two days before the breakout if it is lower) is lower than the price of breakout.

    The signal of “sell” is true if the difference between the price of closing on the eve of breakout and the difference between the maximal prices of closing in the same day (or the price of closing the two days before the breakout if it is higher) exceeds the price of breakout.

    I have discovered three TD Breakout Qualifiers. There are two price models, formed the day before the probable breakout. In addition, there is one model, which is formed in the day of breakout. In particular, I have drawn the following conclusion. If a market is in the state of oversell (overbuy) the day before the breakout, there increases the possibility that the amount (pressure) of buyers (sellers) all the same will not become diminished after the breakout. This makes just illusion of the market strength (weakness).

    Giving analysis to the price behavior on the eve of breakout, I have discovered the following. If the price of closing on the eve of breakout upwards is lower than in the previous day, the probability of the true intra-day breakout increases.

    In this case, it can be recommended to open a position in the intra-day intersection (crossing) of the trend line. I determine this as TD Breakout Qualifier #1 (see Chart 1.37 ??).

    In a way, TD Breakout Qualifier #3 is similar to TD Breakout Qualifier #1. Really, it also takes into account the price movement on the eve of the trend line breakout. However, in the case of TD Breakout Qualifier #3 one determines the difference between the maximum price and the price of closing on the eve of the trend line breakout downwards. Further this difference is subtracted from that very price of closing. It is the method of calculating the supply value. The demand value is calculated in the following way. The difference between the price of closing and the minimum price on the eve of the trend line breakout upwards is added tothat very price of closing (see Charts 2.10, 2.11 (143 and 144)).

    Chart 2.10 S T Bonds. (For view the picture see notes in end of article)

    The true breakout can be detected in the following way. One must find the difference between the price of closing on the eve the breakout upwards and the minimum price in that very day (or the price of closing in the previous day – if it is lower). Further it is necessary to add this difference to the price of closing in the day before the breakout. If the value obtained is lower than the price at the point of breakout, the breakout is considered true. If the value obtained is larger than the price at the point of breakout - most probably, the breakout is false

    In the given example (see Chart ??), the difference between the price of closing and the minimum price on the eve of the breakout of TD-line of supply (A-B) is added to the price of closing in that very day. The value obtained is smaller than the price at the point of breakout. Consequently, the trend line breakout is true. In this chart TD-line of demand (A’-B’) is also drawn (plotted).

    In Chart (145??), for determining whether the trend line breakout downwards is true, the use is made of the procedure, the sense of which is reversed with respect to the above-described one.

    Chart 2.11 S&P 500. (For view the picture see notes in end of article)

    First, one has to determine the difference between the price of closing and the price minimal on the eve of the supply line breakout upwards (A-B). Further, the price of closing in the same very day must be added to this difference. As one can see, the resulting value is smaller than the price at the breakout point. This confirms that the breakout is true.

    Chart 2.12 Soybeans Oil. (For view the picture see notes in end of article)

    The principal drawbacks of the “classical” theory of distinguishing the true and false breakouts of technical levels at Forex from the viewpoint of Masterforex-V TS.

    Such drawbacks are the following.

    1. The “classical” theory of the true and false breakouts of technical levels was developed not issuing from conditions of Forex money-market (where the trading volume was not taken into account). Some other markets were considered.

    2. Even T. DeMarque has recognized that this approach is incorrect in total. This classicist has admitted the following. As far as he is concerned, he still doesn’t know any technique that could permit traders to see whether the price breakout is true or false.

    One can judge by oneself.

    Really, it is evident that the deal opening directly after the previous day technical level breakout must be specified much more exactly. E. Neiman doesn’t write about this aspect directly. However, his approach to the order opening is based on the conviction that a given breakout must happen along the trend development direction. This approach must be scrutinized much more closely. The reason is that the one of the keystone figures of reversal (such as either “the head and shoulders”, or “the head and shoulders reversed”) is purely the result of (exactly indicates) a local peak breakout of the previous day.

    Some traders try “to play safe”. Avoiding not getting into the “head and shoulders” figure, they open deals after 5 (!) days to start from the technical level breakout. In this connection, there arise the following questions.

    Surely, one could give analysis to broad markets post factum. In this case, one can choose heavy trends of the duration within 30-70 days or longer (as Swagger did it). Thus, one can recommend traders to open their deals in the 6th day to start from the technical level breakout.

    However, what’s about the real trading? Under such conditions, a trader does not know the trend actual duration. For instance, see Chart 2.12 GBP/USD pair movement on June 30, 2006 can serve as an example. The support at 1.8000 has been broken through. After waiting for 5 days, one could open a deal in the vicinity to 1.7560 at the 6th day – i.e., after the currency has already advanced more than the half-way in its movement (by 440 points!). Now one could expect a local minimum at 1.7310 - to be more precise, at 1.7435. Exactly at this point, after the breakout thorough the previous day maximum, the currency has reversed.

    Chart 2. 12 GBP/USD pair movement (For view the picture see notes in end of article)

    Thus, making use of the technique by Swagger one can gain just 125 points under the conditions of a strong trend (690 points). However, one must keep in mind that the reversal could happen earlier. That is, one losed 500 point in order to dogmatically stick to the rule “not to open a deal during the first 5 days after the level breakout”. As the result, a deal will be opened at the end of the currency movement or before the recoil. When a dogma does not correspond to the practice any more, it would be better to decline (reject) it, would not it?

    We now dwell on the recoil system according to T. Chand in his book “On the other side of the technical analysis). Notwithstanding all the positive aspects of this system, a very serious drawback is inherent in it. That is, within the framework of this system one cannot detect a point at which the recoil turns into the reversal.

    The theory of the level breakout, developed by D. Cats and D. McCormick in “Encyclopedia of trading strategies”, must be revised (specified) from the viewpoint of (with respect to) the price of closing in the previous day. That is, one can give hundreds of examples when the work according to the given technique is profitable at Forex. At the same time, there are also hundreds of disadvantageous situations – e.g., the breakout through a local peak in the previous day can result either in the reversal or in a very heavy recoil towards the direction, opposite to the level breakout.

    In the framework of the classical analysis given to Forex, the notions of technical levels of resistance/support of tilted (slant) and horizontal channels are not clearly defined – they are just “piled up”. Hence, how can one tell the difference between these characteristics from those the features in common?

    Elder was the first who attracted attention to the following problem. How to elaborate one’s position in all the mess of true and false breakouts, trends and flats in different time frames?

    The currency pair movement may be divided as following.

    a) trend waves;

    b) trend recoils;

    c) a flat.

    After this, all pos

    Choose An Online Business Rather Than A Conventional Business
    Once you have made up your mind to start your own home based business look around you for opportunities that you will be able to do and enjoy. Start out by doing something that will not cost too much to get it off the ground otherwise you might be overwhelmed by the enormity of the project and lose hear before you even begin.It you decide on a business online you will find that this requires much more time than finances. It can become very time consuming in the beginning to get things started correctly. This is so worth the time and effort spent as once everything is put into place you will not have to spend so much time on your online business any more and you will start reaping the benefits which could be quite substantial in some cases.A lot of businesses online fail because of a lack of knowledge and not a lack of work. It is best to learn what you can online you might have to spend some money paying for advice but it will be worth it in the end.How do you know whether or not a business advertised is a legitimate business or a scam. It is sometimes difficult to tell them apart as the scam sites sometimes look so attractive and have so much to “offer” that you are inclined to fall for them. Usually the amount advertised of what you can earn in a very short time is unrealistic. It is virtually impossible to be earning thousand within a few days. With the legitimate businesses it is possible to earn large amounts but it takes a while and you need to put in a lot of work before you can earn money like this.
    crossing) of the trend line. I determine this as TD Breakout Qualifier #1 (see Chart 1.37 ??).

    In a way, TD Breakout Qualifier #3 is similar to TD Breakout Qualifier #1. Really, it also takes into account the price movement on the eve of the trend line breakout. However, in the case of TD Breakout Qualifier #3 one determines the difference between the maximum price and the price of closing on the eve of the trend line breakout downwards. Further this difference is subtracted from that very price of closing. It is the method of calculating the supply value. The demand value is calculated in the following way. The difference between the price of closing and the minimum price on the eve of the trend line breakout upwards is added tothat very price of closing (see Charts 2.10, 2.11 (143 and 144)).

    Chart 2.10 S T Bonds. (For view the picture see notes in end of article)

    The true breakout can be detected in the following way. One must find the difference between the price of closing on the eve the breakout upwards and the minimum price in that very day (or the price of closing in the previous day – if it is lower). Further it is necessary to add this difference to the price of closing in the day before the breakout. If the value obtained is lower than the price at the point of breakout, the breakout is considered true. If the value obtained is larger than the price at the point of breakout - most probably, the breakout is false

    In the given example (see Chart ??), the difference between the price of closing and the minimum price on the eve of the breakout of TD-line of supply (A-B) is added to the price of closing in that very day. The value obtained is smaller than the price at the point of breakout. Consequently, the trend line breakout is true. In this chart TD-line of demand (A’-B’) is also drawn (plotted).

    In Chart (145??), for determining whether the trend line breakout downwards is true, the use is made of the procedure, the sense of which is reversed with respect to the above-described one.

    Chart 2.11 S&P 500. (For view the picture see notes in end of article)

    First, one has to determine the difference between the price of closing and the price minimal on the eve of the supply line breakout upwards (A-B). Further, the price of closing in the same very day must be added to this difference. As one can see, the resulting value is smaller than the price at the breakout point. This confirms that the breakout is true.

    Chart 2.12 Soybeans Oil. (For view the picture see notes in end of article)

    The principal drawbacks of the “classical” theory of distinguishing the true and false breakouts of technical levels at Forex from the viewpoint of Masterforex-V TS.

    Such drawbacks are the following.

    1. The “classical” theory of the true and false breakouts of technical levels was developed not issuing from conditions of Forex money-market (where the trading volume was not taken into account). Some other markets were considered.

    2. Even T. DeMarque has recognized that this approach is incorrect in total. This classicist has admitted the following. As far as he is concerned, he still doesn’t know any technique that could permit traders to see whether the price breakout is true or false.

    One can judge by oneself.

    Really, it is evident that the deal opening directly after the previous day technical level breakout must be specified much more exactly. E. Neiman doesn’t write about this aspect directly. However, his approach to the order opening is based on the conviction that a given breakout must happen along the trend development direction. This approach must be scrutinized much more closely. The reason is that the one of the keystone figures of reversal (such as either “the head and shoulders”, or “the head and shoulders reversed”) is purely the result of (exactly indicates) a local peak breakout of the previous day.

    Some traders try “to play safe”. Avoiding not getting into the “head and shoulders” figure, they open deals after 5 (!) days to start from the technical level breakout. In this connection, there arise the following questions.

    Surely, one could give analysis to broad markets post factum. In this case, one can choose heavy trends of the duration within 30-70 days or longer (as Swagger did it). Thus, one can recommend traders to open their deals in the 6th day to start from the technical level breakout.

    However, what’s about the real trading? Under such conditions, a trader does not know the trend actual duration. For instance, see Chart 2.12 GBP/USD pair movement on June 30, 2006 can serve as an example. The support at 1.8000 has been broken through. After waiting for 5 days, one could open a deal in the vicinity to 1.7560 at the 6th day – i.e., after the currency has already advanced more than the half-way in its movement (by 440 points!). Now one could expect a local minimum at 1.7310 - to be more precise, at 1.7435. Exactly at this point, after the breakout thorough the previous day maximum, the currency has reversed.

    Chart 2. 12 GBP/USD pair movement (For view the picture see notes in end of article)

    Thus, making use of the technique by Swagger one can gain just 125 points under the conditions of a strong trend (690 points). However, one must keep in mind that the reversal could happen earlier. That is, one losed 500 point in order to dogmatically stick to the rule “not to open a deal during the first 5 days after the level breakout”. As the result, a deal will be opened at the end of the currency movement or before the recoil. When a dogma does not correspond to the practice any more, it would be better to decline (reject) it, would not it?

    We now dwell on the recoil system according to T. Chand in his book “On the other side of the technical analysis). Notwithstanding all the positive aspects of this system, a very serious drawback is inherent in it. That is, within the framework of this system one cannot detect a point at which the recoil turns into the reversal.

    The theory of the level breakout, developed by D. Cats and D. McCormick in “Encyclopedia of trading strategies”, must be revised (specified) from the viewpoint of (with respect to) the price of closing in the previous day. That is, one can give hundreds of examples when the work according to the given technique is profitable at Forex. At the same time, there are also hundreds of disadvantageous situations – e.g., the breakout through a local peak in the previous day can result either in the reversal or in a very heavy recoil towards the direction, opposite to the level breakout.

    In the framework of the classical analysis given to Forex, the notions of technical levels of resistance/support of tilted (slant) and horizontal channels are not clearly defined – they are just “piled up”. Hence, how can one tell the difference between these characteristics from those the features in common?

    Elder was the first who attracted attention to the following problem. How to elaborate one’s position in all the mess of true and false breakouts, trends and flats in different time frames?

    The currency pair movement may be divided as following.

    a) trend waves;

    b) trend recoils;

    c) a flat.

    After this, all pos

    Why Blogs Are An Affiliate's Best Friend
    Blogs or web logs (as they used to be called in the early days) are the best thing that ever happened to affiliate marketing. Indeed those affiliates who have been quick to see the amazing opportunities that blogs have opened have made a killing in affiliate revenues and profits.There are many different ways in which blogs can be successfully used to generate more traffic and therefore more income from any affiliate program.How To Use Blogs To Generate Targeted Affiliate Traffic Blogs are ideal for creating buzz and interest on a subject that is closely related to your affiliate product or service. For example if your affiliate product is a painkiller, then you should launch a blog discussing the different types of headaches including the fatal type (caused by a brain tumor or something like that). When you do this, placing a link leading to the painkiller is the most natural thing to do and it will hardly look like advertising. Remember that the less your promotion looks like advertising, the more effective it will tend to be. That is the real secret behind the success of Adsense ads, the fact that they don't look like ads but in fact appear to be links to more information that is relevant to what somebody is already looking at.Blogs Help You Build Up Valuable Links To Your Affiliate Website One very important task that blogs accomplish for affiliates is that they help in quickly building links pointing to the affiliate site. One way links are key in deciding page rank and the position of a site in search engine results. The fact is that blogs ordinarily pick up links much faster than conventional websites and this has helped many affiliate products remain
    point. This confirms that the breakout is true.

    Chart 2.12 Soybeans Oil. (For view the picture see notes in end of article)

    The principal drawbacks of the “classical” theory of distinguishing the true and false breakouts of technical levels at Forex from the viewpoint of Masterforex-V TS.

    Such drawbacks are the following.

    1. The “classical” theory of the true and false breakouts of technical levels was developed not issuing from conditions of Forex money-market (where the trading volume was not taken into account). Some other markets were considered.

    2. Even T. DeMarque has recognized that this approach is incorrect in total. This classicist has admitted the following. As far as he is concerned, he still doesn’t know any technique that could permit traders to see whether the price breakout is true or false.

    One can judge by oneself.

    Really, it is evident that the deal opening directly after the previous day technical level breakout must be specified much more exactly. E. Neiman doesn’t write about this aspect directly. However, his approach to the order opening is based on the conviction that a given breakout must happen along the trend development direction. This approach must be scrutinized much more closely. The reason is that the one of the keystone figures of reversal (such as either “the head and shoulders”, or “the head and shoulders reversed”) is purely the result of (exactly indicates) a local peak breakout of the previous day.

    Some traders try “to play safe”. Avoiding not getting into the “head and shoulders” figure, they open deals after 5 (!) days to start from the technical level breakout. In this connection, there arise the following questions.

    Surely, one could give analysis to broad markets post factum. In this case, one can choose heavy trends of the duration within 30-70 days or longer (as Swagger did it). Thus, one can recommend traders to open their deals in the 6th day to start from the technical level breakout.

    However, what’s about the real trading? Under such conditions, a trader does not know the trend actual duration. For instance, see Chart 2.12 GBP/USD pair movement on June 30, 2006 can serve as an example. The support at 1.8000 has been broken through. After waiting for 5 days, one could open a deal in the vicinity to 1.7560 at the 6th day – i.e., after the currency has already advanced more than the half-way in its movement (by 440 points!). Now one could expect a local minimum at 1.7310 - to be more precise, at 1.7435. Exactly at this point, after the breakout thorough the previous day maximum, the currency has reversed.

    Chart 2. 12 GBP/USD pair movement (For view the picture see notes in end of article)

    Thus, making use of the technique by Swagger one can gain just 125 points under the conditions of a strong trend (690 points). However, one must keep in mind that the reversal could happen earlier. That is, one losed 500 point in order to dogmatically stick to the rule “not to open a deal during the first 5 days after the level breakout”. As the result, a deal will be opened at the end of the currency movement or before the recoil. When a dogma does not correspond to the practice any more, it would be better to decline (reject) it, would not it?

    We now dwell on the recoil system according to T. Chand in his book “On the other side of the technical analysis). Notwithstanding all the positive aspects of this system, a very serious drawback is inherent in it. That is, within the framework of this system one cannot detect a point at which the recoil turns into the reversal.

    The theory of the level breakout, developed by D. Cats and D. McCormick in “Encyclopedia of trading strategies”, must be revised (specified) from the viewpoint of (with respect to) the price of closing in the previous day. That is, one can give hundreds of examples when the work according to the given technique is profitable at Forex. At the same time, there are also hundreds of disadvantageous situations – e.g., the breakout through a local peak in the previous day can result either in the reversal or in a very heavy recoil towards the direction, opposite to the level breakout.

    In the framework of the classical analysis given to Forex, the notions of technical levels of resistance/support of tilted (slant) and horizontal channels are not clearly defined – they are just “piled up”. Hence, how can one tell the difference between these characteristics from those the features in common?

    Elder was the first who attracted attention to the following problem. How to elaborate one’s position in all the mess of true and false breakouts, trends and flats in different time frames?

    The currency pair movement may be divided as following.

    a) trend waves;

    b) trend recoils;

    c) a flat.

    After this, all pos

    Keys To Successful and Profitable Niche Marketing
    The market world is increasingly becoming specialized. Instead of offering a wide variety of goods or services, businesses prefer to cater to a select few. Also known as a niche market, serving such a well-defined segment gives businesses more time to focus on their customers’ needs and provide them quality service. However, the challenge is competing with bigger brands and how to beat them at their own game by using the key to niche marketing.The key to niche marketing lies in getting ahead of the competition. This means getting to know your niche market, offering them services most big brands cannot provide, advertising heavily and giving them something more that just a smile. In order to use the key to niche marketing more effectively, one must be ready to abandon old marketing concepts, be creative and resourceful.One element abandoned by the key to niche marketing is the principle of place. With the rise of the Internet, advertising, promotion and service have never been easier to get the key to niche marketing. You can do business online, set up shop in its virtual space or update an existing establishment and its services. The key to niche marketing is to know what your market segment more than the competition and meet their demands.The key to niche marketing begins with research. You have to know your market segment intimately: what are their needs, their lifestyle and buying behavior. How often do they need your product/service and are they willingly to pay more for quality. All of these must be taken into account because it will help you define the key to niche marketing. The pricing, advertising and promotion rests on their response and is another part of the key to nic
    ement (by 440 points!). Now one could expect a local minimum at 1.7310 - to be more precise, at 1.7435. Exactly at this point, after the breakout thorough the previous day maximum, the currency has reversed.

    Chart 2. 12 GBP/USD pair movement (For view the picture see notes in end of article)

    Thus, making use of the technique by Swagger one can gain just 125 points under the conditions of a strong trend (690 points). However, one must keep in mind that the reversal could happen earlier. That is, one losed 500 point in order to dogmatically stick to the rule “not to open a deal during the first 5 days after the level breakout”. As the result, a deal will be opened at the end of the currency movement or before the recoil. When a dogma does not correspond to the practice any more, it would be better to decline (reject) it, would not it?

    We now dwell on the recoil system according to T. Chand in his book “On the other side of the technical analysis). Notwithstanding all the positive aspects of this system, a very serious drawback is inherent in it. That is, within the framework of this system one cannot detect a point at which the recoil turns into the reversal.

    The theory of the level breakout, developed by D. Cats and D. McCormick in “Encyclopedia of trading strategies”, must be revised (specified) from the viewpoint of (with respect to) the price of closing in the previous day. That is, one can give hundreds of examples when the work according to the given technique is profitable at Forex. At the same time, there are also hundreds of disadvantageous situations – e.g., the breakout through a local peak in the previous day can result either in the reversal or in a very heavy recoil towards the direction, opposite to the level breakout.

    In the framework of the classical analysis given to Forex, the notions of technical levels of resistance/support of tilted (slant) and horizontal channels are not clearly defined – they are just “piled up”. Hence, how can one tell the difference between these characteristics from those the features in common?

    Elder was the first who attracted attention to the following problem. How to elaborate one’s position in all the mess of true and false breakouts, trends and flats in different time frames?

    The currency pair movement may be divided as following.

    a) trend waves;

    b) trend recoils;

    c) a flat.

    After this, all possible combinations of these three characteristics must be put on trial in various time-frames at least at 3 screens - as A. Elder has recommended.

    It is necessary to calculate the number of combinations. For instance, there is the combination #1. That is, the trend is in the minimal timeframe, whereas the flat is in the large-scale timeframe.

    At what points it must be determined whereas level breakouts are false or true?

    Is it enough to use three screens (displays) according to Elder? Maybe more screens would be preferable.

    As far as I’m concerned, I work with 4 screens. What are the drawbacks and advantages of the given technique?

    How different timeframes are correlated with one another under the following condition. That is, at one’s point-of-sale terminal, there are 4 screens. However, one must take into account the quantity of timeframes much larger.

    What is the correlation between the technical levels of resistance and those of support, all of them being exposed at 4 screens?

    In what way do the fundamental and technical analyses supplement each other? How can a trader make use of the fundamental analysis from the viewpoint of its applying in the branch of the technical analysis, the problems of which are enumerated above?

    Note: Full text of this article and pictures of examples you can see on
    http://www.masterforex-v.su/002_002.htm

    If you wish to be trained on Trading System Masterforex-V - one of new and most effective techniques of trade on Forex in the world visit http://www.masterforex-v.su/

    HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
    <a href="http://www.added4u.com/article/94304/added4u-Forex-Secrets--The-True-And-False-Breakouts-Of-The-Resistance-And-Support-Levels-on-Forex-Part-II.html">Forex Secrets - The True And False Breakouts Of The Resistance And Support Levels on Forex (Part II)</a>

    BB link (for phorums):
    [url=http://www.added4u.com/article/94304/added4u-Forex-Secrets--The-True-And-False-Breakouts-Of-The-Resistance-And-Support-Levels-on-Forex-Part-II.html]Forex Secrets - The True And False Breakouts Of The Resistance And Support Levels on Forex (Part II)[/url]

    Related Articles:

    How to Create a WIN/WIN When a Prospect Requests a Discount

    Communications Considerations for IPO Companies

    Three Fraud Traps for Small Businesses

    Bookmark it: del.icio.us digg.com reddit.com netvouz.com google.com yahoo.com technorati.com furl.net bloglines.com socialdust.com ma.gnolia.com newsvine.com slashdot.org simpy.com shadows.com blinklist.com